BlueLandscape Invoicing vs WeFact.

Two focused tools, different choices

WeFact and BlueLandscape both specialise in invoicing — not full accounting, not ERP, not 100 features you don't use. In that sense we're each other's closest comparison. The difference is the shape:

WeFact uses forms, fixed-tier pricing, and a mature feature set built over years: a client-login customer portal, subscription billing module, integrations with major accounting packages. BlueLandscape is much younger and works differently: everything through an AI conversation, pay-per-use, and expanding into a suite of other tools (customer interviews, time-logging, and administration are live; CRM, hour-management with approval, and project-management on the roadmap).

Where WeFact wins

• Client-login customer portal. Clients log in, view open invoices, pay online, download their full history. For B2B with larger customers that's a real trust signal. We ship a per-invoice secure link with the same pay-online options, but no login or cross-invoice history.
• Subscription/recurring billing module. For freelancers with recurring invoicing (monthly contracts, hosting, retainers), WeFact has a built-in subscription engine. We don't.
• Integrations with NL accounting packages. WeFact ties into the major Dutch accounting tools. We send UBL/Peppol with each invoice — that's the integration.
• Stability + track record. WeFact has been running for years with an established customer base. We're younger.

Where we win

• Speed of creating an invoice. "Invoice ACME for 16 hours senior consulting at €125." One sentence, invoice ready. WeFact's form-flow is faster than Moneybird's but still meaningful clicking for a simple invoice.
• Price for low volume. €0.20 per invoice, no subscription — compare that to WeFact's current plan price on their pricing page to see which wins at your volume.
• UBL/Peppol on every invoice. Included at every level. WeFact offers it, but tier-dependent.
• AI drafting + correction. Need a tweak? "Make that line €110 instead of €125" — done. No field to hunt down and refill.
• Chat-configured reminders. "Escalate to a firmer tone after 14 days" instead of a settings dashboard — same escalating cadence, set in the same conversation as the invoice.
• Shared client base with our other tools. The companies and persons you invoice are the same ones you use in customer interviews, time-logging, and administration (all live). One address book for the whole suite.

Migrating from WeFact

Not yet one-click. Export clients + products from WeFact and add them from the clients list, or paste them and let the assistant create them (bulk CSV import is on the roadmap), and start a fresh invoice number sequence. Existing WeFact invoices stay viewable in WeFact as long as you keep that account active.

Side by side

Our honest take

If you have a B2B clientele that expects to log in and see their full invoice history, or you have a subscription business model with recurring billing: stay with WeFact. Our versions of those features come later — today, we don't have them. Automated dunning itself isn't a reason to stay: we chase overdue invoices automatically too.

If you're a freelancer or small team with manageable invoice volume (10–30/month), want an AI that drafts the invoice in one sentence, and already use our other tools (or see value in them coming): BlueLandscape is the choice. Cheaper for what you send, and expandable.